Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 R.I. 142 - State v. Jenison

State v. Jenison’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

1 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2001 · most notably State v. Couture (1984), State v. Haskins (1982)

1 district · 34 state decisions

2701979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Swain v. State of Alabama · Taylor v. Louisiana · Castaneda v. Partida · Hurtado v. People of the State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Moreover, the appropriate way to avoid interfering with the scholarly pursuits of professor and student alike is by exempting, not excluding, them from service in appropriate cases. The total and arbitrary exclusion of the university and college academic community from the grand-jury selection process is an impermissible violation of the due-process right of the criminal defendant to be indicted by an impartial grand jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community.” 405 A.2d at 10 . 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. ““a state electing to use the grand-jury system must abide by the requirements of due process in assuring that the selection process draws jurors from a fair cross-section of the community.” State v. Jenison, R.I., 405 A.2d at 7 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. ““cognizable class playing a major role in the community, without a rational reason therefor, impermissibly offends the fair cross-section requirement * * State v. Jenison, R.I., 405 A.2d at 8 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.