122 So. 2d 1 - State v. Stuler’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2015
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell · Ex parte Curtis · Kane v. Walsh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“pernicious political activities inimical to the public interest and to protect the public itself from the impositions of political organizations which might be tempted to coerce political action of public employees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huerta v. Flood“Political activities of state, county and municipal officers and employees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huerta v. Flood“to prevent public employees from engaging in”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Huerta v. Flood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.