Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 So. 2d 507 - Bashaw v. Dyke

122 So. 2d 507 - Bashaw v. Dyke’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 1988
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 1988

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

130196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Company, Inc. · State v. Bohanan · 61 So. 2d 477 - Earley v. Morrison Cafeteria Co. of Orlando · 108 So. 2d 638 - Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Goff · Deane v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Diversion of attention as contemplated by the rule is to be distinguished from a mere lack of attention by reason of voluntary interest in some collateral matter. The fact that one momentarily forgets the existence of a hazard or fails to pay any attention to what he is doing, with nothing to distract his attention from it, is no excuse for his failure to observe the hazard and the diversion rule is not applicable under such circumstances. * *"”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * Like the doctrine of sudden emergency and last clear chance, the effect of the rule is to absolve one whose right to relief might otherwise be barred because of contributory negligence, and since it creates an exception to the general rules governing negligence, its application must be strictly limited to those cases in which its pertinence is clearly established by the evidence. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a recent innovation of the law of negligence in Florida.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.