122 So. 3d 429
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 18, 2013
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-09-18
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2014
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“HOW SHOULD MANIFEST INJUSTICE BE DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF A CLAIM OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE AFTER A GUILTY PLEA?”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 149 So. 3d 680 - State of Florida v. Michael Perez
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-09-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
¶2Upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion, we certify the following question to our supreme court as one of great public importance:
HOW SHOULD MANIFEST INJUSTICE BE DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF A CLAIM OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE AFTER A GUILTY PLEA?
Certification granted.
¶3SHEPHERD, C.J., and WELLS and LAGOA, JJ., concur.