Armstrong v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1950
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Birdwell v. Cox · Field & Co. v. Fowler · Manowitz v. Gaenslen · THOMAS v. SMITH · Clayton D. Brown Co. v. O'Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The purpose and object of the rule is to relieve the court of the necessity of determining disputes. 60 C.J., § 5, p. 41. But an oral stipulation which is not disputed is regarded obligatory, though not reduced to writing, and may be enforced.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.