State v. Hackler’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) Where the appellate court reviews the decision of a trial court, each point shall: (A) identify the trial court ruling or action that the appellant challenges; (B) state concisely the legal reasons for the appellant’s claim of reversible error; and (C) explain in summary fashion why, in the context of the case, those legal reasons support the claim of reversible error. The point shall be in substantially the following form: ‘The trial court erred in [identify the challenged ruling or action], because [state the legal reasons for the claim of reversible error], in that [explain why the legal reasons, in the context of the case, support the claim of reversible error].’”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bieri v. Gower

2. “unable to give meaningful review to Appellant’s claim of error,” id. at 136 , however, in the present matter there was extensive, detailed testimony by Deputy Huffman regarding the checks at issue. Accordingly, we rely on that testimony to assist us in our review of this appeal. 5 . Wife told Deputy Huffman that she paid herself trustee fees as allowed by statute and she calculated that amount at”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Holman