Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

122 S.W.3d 645

Patterson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-10-28

Decided 2003-10-28

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Alonzo Patterson (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his postconviction motion because trial counsel was ineffective in failing (1) to call an alibi witness and (2) to contact, subpoena, and call the alibi witness. We affirm.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. *646The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/122/sw3d/645 · .json · Public domain