Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

122 S.W.3d 646

Woods v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-10-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2014

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-10-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Stephen D. Woods (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶3We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/122/sw3d/646 · .json · Public domain