¶1The question as to whether or not the bonds involved in this suit could have been abrogated or can-celled by authority of an election and vote of the people, held for that purpose, is not before us, and we express no opinion upon that question. We have, therefore, dismissed the application for writ of error under the statute for want of jurisdiction.
122 Tex. 53
52 S.W.2d 53
Orr v. Marrs
Decided July 6, 1932
Texas Supreme Court · decided 1932-07-06
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1969
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1932-07-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →