Beedle v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis
122 U.S. 71 · 1887
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 18 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2013 · most notably Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover (1959), Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. (1921)
18 federal appellate · 18 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Root v. Railway Co. · Clark Ex'X v. Wooster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"There is no evidence in ihe record of any use or sale of the invention by Breen before liis application for a patent, and no evidence from which to conclude that any use of any driven well by others before his application was consented to or allowed by him, except in the instances mentioned at Cortland, which were merely experimental tests, made by himself. Much less is there any evidence to show that there was any use of the invention by others for more than (wo years prior to his application.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““As the patent was in force at the time the bill was filed, and the complainants were entitled to a preliminary injunction at that time, the jurisdiction of the court is not defeated by the expiration of the patent by lapse of time before final decree.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“of constructing wells by driving or forcing an instrument into the ground until it is projected into the water, without removing the earth upward as it is in boring, substantially as herein described;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Andrews v. Hovey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.