122 Wash. 2d 688 - State v. Solberg’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably 123 Wash. 2d 173 - State v. Young (1994), State v. Copeland (1996)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Payton v. New York · United States v. Watson · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · United States v. Santana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the protections afforded in Payton clearly do not apply outside the physical boundaries of the home as the theoretical basis of the Payton decision is that an arrest within a home violates the sanctity of the home whereas outside the boundaries of the home, no such violation is present.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. White“[ejnsure that the punishment for a criminal offense is proportionate to the seriousness of the offense and the offender’s criminal history” and to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“An arrest warrant is not required in such circumstances under either the federal or state constitutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Eserjose
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.