122 Wis. 2d 759 - State v. Lewandowski’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2019
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · 105 Wis. 2d 171 - Mueller v. Brunn · 100 Wis. 2d 342 - In Matter of Estate of Bilsie · 113 Wis. 2d 662 - State v. MacEmon · 119 Wis. 2d 414 - State v. Curbello-Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant's criminal record, history of undesirable behavior patterns, personality and social traits, results of a presentence investigation, the aggravated nature of the crime, degree of culpability, demeanor at trial, remorse, repentance and cooperativeness, educational and employment history, the need for close rehabilitative control and the rights of the public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“might be found if the trial court failed to state on the record the material factors [that] influenced its decision, gave too much weight to one factor in the face of contravening considerations, or relied on irrelevant or immaterial factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Saying that defects [in a juvenile court waiver hearing] deprive a trial court of subject matter jurisdiction does not make it so. A juvenile court has jurisdiction to err. The alleged defects are not jurisdictional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.