Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Colo. 16 - Struble v. Hicks

Struble v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1999

12 state decisions

5019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . Scrugham · People ex rel. Burchinell v. District Court · Norquist v. Norquist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no merit in the contention of counsel that the court in the civil action was without authority to issue a writ in the nature of ne exeat upon proper showing that such a writ would be for the protection of the interests of the litigant. The rules of civil procedure are not to be read otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.