Stender v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1979
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Warren v. Adams · Zackheim v. Zackheim · Jerome v. Bohm · Faden v. Estate of Midcap · Allen v. Shires
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"He for whose protection the statute was enacted may not juggle with it. He may not claim it in part and waive it in part as suits his convenience. Otherwise this act, passed for the purpose of preventing fraud, might become the instrument of fraud." Zackheim v. Zackheim, 75 Colo. 161 , 225 P. 268 (1924).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.