Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

123 F. 78

Docket No. 829.

Insley v. Garside

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1903.)

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1903-05-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1939

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Insley v. Garside

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1903-05-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and Modifying Decree.

¶2PER CURIAM.

¶3The petition for a rehearing is denied, but it is ordered that the concluding portion of the decree of this court (121 Fed. 699) be modified to read as follows: “On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded to the said District Court for further proceedings, and with instructions to give effect to the proof of the appellees as a claim proven in the name of Caroline Sharick; the appellees to be subrogated to her rights thereunder only upon proof of their payment to her of the sum payable thereon out of the bankrupt estate.”

/123/f1d/78 · .json · Public domain