Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 F.2d 48 - Morton v. Henderson

Morton v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis

123 F.2d 48 · 1941

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
September 1960
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 1960

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

70194119501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mooney v. Holohan · Frank v. Mangum · Bowen v. Johnston · Robb v. Connolly · Knewel v. Egan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defenses based on federal rights must be shown to have been inadequately protected in the state court, not merely inadequately presented, before resort may be had to the remedy of habeas corpus in the federal courts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.