United States v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
123 F.3d 1181 · 1997
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably United States of America v. John Fife Symington III (1999), United States v. Rodriguez-Preciado (2005)
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1716 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“some government culpability must be shown to prove a deprivation of due process”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Paradis v. Arave
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.