Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 F.3d 580 - Levine v. Kling

Levine v. Kling’s Empirical Analysis

123 F.3d 580 · 1997

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
16
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 19 Cal. 4th 532 - Wiley v. County of San Diego (1998), 373 Ill. App. 3d 512 - People v. Barnslater (2007)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 28 state decisions — followed in 16 states

1501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1958

Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Krahn v. Kinney · Peeler v. Hughes & Luce · Glenn v. Aiken · Appley v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]y operation of the doctrine of collateral estoppel, a valid criminal conviction acts as a bar to overturning that conviction in a civil damages suit,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[c]riminal law entitles a criminal defendant to competent counsel, but the consequence if counsel is incompetent and conviction results is a new trial, not an acquittal. E.g., Holman v. Page, 95 F.3d 481, 492 (7th Cir.1996). If the defendant is guilty in law, eventually he will probably be convicted even if competently represented-and he should be. To award the defendant eventually justly convicted and imprisoned substantial money (here $3.5 million is sought) for the loss of his liberty, or for that matter any money, is to give him relief to which criminal law, and the federal constitutional right to counsel, does not entitle him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If [the plaintiff's] postconviction attacks on the conviction fail, then he cannot bring a malpractice suit even if he is prepared to present evidence that he was innocent in fact, and his conviction was therefore unjust. For by operation of the doctrine of collateral estoppel, a valid criminal conviction acts as a bar to overturning that conviction in a civil damages suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.