Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 F.3d 922 - In Re Edward Hanserd, Movant

In Re Edward Hanserd, Movant’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably In Re James Davenport and Sherman Nichols (1998), In Re: Byron Jones, A/K/A Carl Lee, A/K/A B, Movant (2000)

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · North Carolina v. Alford · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Koon v. United States · McCarthy v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We therefore hold that a federal prisoner must satisfy the new requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 only if he has filed a previous § 2255 motion on or after April 24, 1996, the date AEDPA was signed into law. As Hanserd's previous § 2255 motion was filed before that date, he does not need to meet this new standard to file a second motion.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Our holding means that federal inmates will have one post-AEDPA bite at the apple, limited further, for prisoners who filed a § 2255 motion before AEDPA's enactment, by the old abuse-of-the-writ standard.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.