Weems v. Timberlands

¶1Mark Weems appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment entered after trial on his Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act claims, but he did not furnish a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(l)-(2) (appellant’s duty to order transcript). Weems complains about issues that are unreviewable without a transcript. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review sufficiency of evidence presented at trial), cert. *269denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988).

¶2Because there are no grounds presented for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.