Fuller v. Myers’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2024
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Helling v. McKinney · Roberts v. United States District Court · Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie · Steele v. Federal Bureau of Prisons · Mae Lee Hunt v. Judy Uphoff James Ferguson Jim Davis John Peery Dr Englesjerd Dr Paul Long Dr Zanny Reimer Dr Mike Jording Dr Kenneth William Schulze
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendants are permitted to mount a facial challenge, based on full development of the facts, to the district court’s provisional determination on the face of the complaint that [the prisoner] satisfies the 'imminent danger' element.” Fuller v. Myers, 123 Fed.Appx. at 368 (emphasis added); see Taylor v. Watkins, 623 F.3d 483, 485 (7th Cir.2010) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.