123 F. App'x 921 - Kanth v. Lubeck’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257
Relies on Younger v. Harris · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Hall v. Bellmon · Taunt v. General Retirement System of Detroit
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requested the federal court to assume jurisdiction over the state divorce proceedings, to dismiss the [state] divorce decree, and restore to him full custodial and visitation rights to his two minor children.” Id. at 123 Fed.Appx. 921 , 2005 WL 388734 . The district court dismissed the plaintiff's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the state court judgment caused, actually and proximately, the injury for which the federal court plaintiff seeks redress.” Id. (quoting Kenmen Eng'g v. City of Union, 314 F.3d at 476 ). Concluding that the relief sought by the plaintiff”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.