Ex parte Gros’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (§ 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States Bilokumsky v. Tod · Ng Fung Ho v. White · Kessler v. Strecker · Carmichael v. Delaney · United States ex rel. Chu Leung v. Shaughnessy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Only in the event an alleged alien asserts his United States citizenship in the hearing before the Department, and supports his claim by substantial evidence, is he entitled to a trial de novo of that issue in the district court. The status of the relator must be judicially determined, because jurisdiction in the executive to- order deportation exists only if the person arrested is an alien; * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Frausto v. Brownell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.