State v. Mark’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cunningham v. California · 52 Cal. 3d 815 - People v. Daniels · State v. Arceo · State v. Richie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen jury instructions or the omission thereof are at issue on appeal, the standard of review is whether, when read and considered as a whole, the instructions given are prejudicially insufficient, erroneous, inconsistent, or 9 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER misleading.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pascua · State v. Thromman“must be examined in the light of the entire proceedings and given the effect which the whole record shows [them] to be entitled.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pascua · State v. Thromman“Under HRPC Rule 1.7, (a) A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client will be directly adverse to another client, unless: (1) the lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not adversely affect the relationship with the other client; and (2) each client consents after consultation. (b) A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation of that client may be materially limited by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client or to a third person, or by the lawyer’s own interests, unless: (1) the lawyer reasonably believes the representation will not be adversely affected; and (2) the client consents after consultation. When representation of multiple clients in a single matter is undertaken, the consultation shall include explanation of the implications of the common representation and the advantages and risks involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Forman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.