Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Idaho 55 - State v. Orr

State v. Orr’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stuart v. State · Anderson v. Gailey · State v. Martin · McBride v. Ford Motor Co. · State v. Griffith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his Court has held that where a plea bargain is entered into between a defendant and a prosecutor, and the plea bargain is withdrawn by the defendant or rejected by the court, there is no violation of due process for the defendant to stand trial on the original charge, or to be subjected to a more sever sentence than that contained in the plea bargain agreement which the defendant later rejected. Stuart v. State, 118 Idaho 865 , 801 P.2d 1216 (1990).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.