Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 LA 164 - Darsam v. Kohlmann

Darsam v. Kohlmann’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1992

19 state decisions

601909191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marino v. . Lehmaier · Hudson v. Wabash Western Railway Co. · Lopes v. Sahuque · Clements v. Louisiana Electric Light Co. · Taylor v. Carew Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The view which more nearly comports with judicial analogies is that such unlawful employment of a child does not, per se, constitute negligence which will render the employer liable for injuries to the child, where such employment is not the direct or proximate cause of the injury.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The fact that defendant’s violation of duty consists in the violation of a statute will not relieve the plaintiff of the obligation of showing that he was in the exercise of due care.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in the actual discharge of the duties for which they were employed in violation of prohibitory statutes, and hence sustained their injuries by reason of such employment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.