Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

123 Mass. 358

Clark v. Gardner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 8, 1877

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1877-11-08

Trustee process begun in the Second District Court of Bristol, where judgment was entered against the principal defendants, and George Winslow and Henry H. Elsbree appeared as claimants of the funds in the hands of the trustee, and were adjudged to be entitled to the funds, and the trustee, who had filed no answer, was discharged. The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court.

Relies on Peck Bros. & Co. v. Stratton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1877-11-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1903

4 state decisions

101877188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gray, C. J.

¶1An adverse claimant is admitted as a party to the suit solely for the purpose of maintaining his right as against the plaintiff to goods, effects or credits in the hands of the supposed trustee, and not for the purpose of trying as against the defendant or the trustee the right to funds to which the plaintiff does not or cannot assert any title. Gen. Sts. e. 142, § 15. St. 1865, c. 43. Boylen v. Young, 6 Allen, 582. Peck v. Stratton, 118 Mass. 406. Evidence that there were no goods, effects or credits of the defendants in the hands of the trustee at the time of the service of the writ upon him would in effect prove the claimant out of court. The decision below admitting such evidence was therefore erroneous, and, as the judgment in favor of the claimant may have been founded upon it, the

¶2Plaintiff’s exceptions must be sustained

/123/mass/358 · .json · Public domain