¶1The objections to the complaint were not relied on in argument. The objection to the form of the warrant, if it could ever have availed the defendant, was waived by his omission to take it in the District Court, and could not be first made in the Superior Court. Commonwealth v. Henry, 7 Cush. 512. Exceptions overruled
123 Mass. 416
Commonwealth v. Hart
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 28, 1877
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1877-11-28
Complaint on the Gen. Sts. c. 87, §§ 6, 7, made and sworn to by William W. Pratt before a justice of the peace on December ‘1, 1876, and charging the defendant in due and usual form with unlawfully keeping and maintaining a common nuisance, to wit, a tenement used for the illegal keeping and illegal sale of intoxicating liquors, at Stoneham, “on the first day of July in the year, of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-six, and .on divers other days and times…
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1892
6 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1877-11-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →