Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 ME 256 - State v. King

State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 1992 · most notably State v. True (1981), State v. Lizotte (1969)

30 state decisions

10019231930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is practical unanimity of opinion, that the fact such a complaint (of rape) was made is always admissible as a part of the State’s evidence in chief, if the prosecutrix takes the stand, in corroboration of her evidence, but not the details of the complaint----” (Emphasis supplied.) State v. King, 123 Me. 256, 258 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.