Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 ME 424 - Brown's Case

Brown's Case’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
22
states following
April 1977
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 1977 · most notably Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Griggs (1940), 77 Cal. App. 343 - Hyer v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Automobile Club (1926)

53 state decisions — followed in 22 states

150192419301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ ‘ By all authorities an occurrence to be accidental must be unusual, undesigned, unexpected, sudden. The word is commonly predicated of occurrences external to the body, e. g. wrecks, explosions, collisions, and other fortuitous mishaps in the world of things about us. Such external accidents may or may not cause bodily injuries. But an internal injury that is itself sudden, unusual, and unexpected, is none the less accidental because its external cause is a part of the victim’s ordinary work. “If a laborer performing his usual task, in his wonted way, by reason of strain, breaks his wrist, nobody would question the accidental nature of the injury. If instead of the wrist it is an artery that breaks, the occurrence is just as clearly an accident. So held by this court in the case of Patrick v. [J. B.] Ham [Co.], [ 119 Me. 510, 517 , 111 A. 912 , 13 A. L. R. 427]. And if the strain, instead of causing the rupture of a subordinate blood vessel, produces a sudden dilatation of the heart itself, the occurrence is none the less accidental. “ ‘A strain incurred by the workman in the ordinary discharge of his duties caused the rupture from which he died. * * * It is not open to this court to say that this is not an accident.’ Hughes v. Clover, 2 B. W. C. C.17.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “arising out of and in the course of the employment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.