Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 MICH 239 - Torpy v. Betts

Torpy v. Betts’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1929
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1929

4 state decisions

20190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manice v. . Manice · Crooke v. . County of Kings · Thatcher v. Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Andrew's Church · Sawyer v. . Cubby · Murphy v. . Whitney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “■ “ The number of contingencies are not material if they are all to happen within a life in being.” Torpy v. Betts, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.