Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 MICH 265 - Ormsbee v. Piper

Ormsbee v. Piper’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
November 1942
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1942

4 state decisions

1019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Forsche · Foote v. Foote · Needham v. Gillett · Letts v. Letts · McCleary v. Menke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nowhere do we find that an administrator duly appointed without appeal can be denied the uncollected, choses in action yet belonging to the estate, upon the ground that the heirs have agreed that there should, be no administration of the estate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.