State v. Wallen’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1965
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Schueller · State v. Ryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * The precise date was not material [in the Wallen case], and the complainant may have been mistaken in that respect. State v. Ryan, 78 Minn. 218 , 80 N. W. 962 , is not in point. In that case it appeared from the testimony of the prosecutrix that but one act of intercourse ever took place between the parties, and she definitely and specifically indicated the place and occasion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nelson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.