Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

123 Misc. 156

Luft v. Kaplan

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1924-04-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1958

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-04-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The jury having retired and later requested certain information, it was manifestly error for the trial justice, in the absence of counsel and without their consent, to transmit his instructions to the jury through a court attendant. Judgment, therefore, reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

¶2All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Wasservogel, JJ.

¶3Judgment reversed.

/123/misc/156 · .json · Public domain