Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

123 Misc. 168

Secor v. Heyman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1924-05-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1977

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-05-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1In an action instituted by a firm of stockbrokers to recover against its customer the price of certain stock purchased on his behalf, the defendant’s counsel in his summation to the jury said: “ There is many a man sitting on the benches in the park because he lost his money down in Wall street.” This remark was unwarranted and grossly prejudicial to plaintiffs’ rights, and demands a reversal of the judgment and a new trial.

¶2Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellants to abide the event.

¶3Wagner and Wasservogel, JJ., concur; Guy, J., dissents.

¶4Judgment reversed.

/123/misc/168 · .json · Public domain