Diamond v. Talbot’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1931
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sinclair v. . Purdy · Briggs v. . Partridge · Case v. . Case
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ I have read with interest that portion of the learned brief of plaintiff’s counsel, which is based upon the fine reasoning of Judge Cardozo in Sinclair v. Purdy ( 235 N. Y. 245 ). I do not think, however, there is any evidence here of a promise by the defendant wife to convey the property to her husband, or of such an abuse of her confidential relation with him as would lead, without a writing, to the implication of a trust in favor of the defendant Frank Talbot, of the real estate in question.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schmitz v. Schmitz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.