Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 MOAPP 521 - Wilson-Moline Buggy Co. v. Priebe

Wilson-Moline Buggy Co. v. Priebe’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1989

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

60190719101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sturm v. Boker · Tri-State Amusement Co. v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co. · Lenz v. Harrison · Harris v. Coe · Ehrhardt v. Robertson Bros.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The elements of the contract, which together indelibly stamp the transactions with the characteristics of 'a bailment for sale, thus may be summarized; (1) The reservation by plaintiff of the title to the property. (2) The absence of any mutual intention that defendant should become the owner of the property at any time or in any event. (31 The obligation of defendant not to pay for the goods as upon a purchase made by him, but only to pay for goods disposed of by him in the course of the relation. (4) The implied obligation of defendant to restore to plaintiff the goods remaining in his hands at the end of the relation. See authorities supra. The conclusion is irresistible that plaintiff, by means of its factors, had established and was conducting in St. Joseph a fixed and stable business for the sale of its wares, and thereby had become a resident foreign corporation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.