123 N.C. App. 361 - State v. Sisk’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · David W. McKay v. Texas · State v. Mason · State v. Gladden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order for this Court to find that the error affecting defendant's constitutional rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, we must determine that the error had no bearing on the jury deliberations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A violation of the defendant's rights under the Constitution of the United States is prejudicial unless the appellate court finds that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a mistake in such information which is mere surplusage may be ignored if its inclusion has not prejudiced defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stroud
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.