State v. Rosaire’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably State v. Dowling (2011), State v. Mascareñas (2000)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lockhart v. Nelson · State v. Sutphin · State v. Garcia · United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co. · State v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e hold that where the trial court errs by failing to instruct the jury on an essential element of the crime, retrial following appeal is not barred if the evidence below was sufficient to convict the defendant under the erroneous jury instruction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sena · State v. Mascarenas“Any prisoner whose limits of confinement have been extended, or who has been granted a visitation privilege under the inmate-release program, who willfully fails to return to the designated place of confinement within the time prescribed, with the intent not to return, is guilty of an escape. Whoever is convicted of an escape under the provisions of this section is guilty of a third degree felony and shall be sentenced pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-18-15 NMSA 1978.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rosaire“The standard of review for sufficiency of evidence claims requires us to view all of the evidence in the light most favorable to support the jury's verdict, and to determine whether any rational jury could find all elements of the crime based on the facts presented at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Padilla
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.