Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 N.M. 42 - State v. TYWAYNE H.

State v. TYWAYNE H.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
8
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 211 Wis. 2d 140 - State v. Angelia D.B. (1997), In Re Josue T. (1999)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 49 state decisions

200199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Horton v. California · Rawlings v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here is a sharp distinction between the purpose of a search by a school official and a search by a police officer. The nature of a T.L.O. search by a school authority is to maintain order and discipline in the school. The nature of a search by a police officer is to obtain evidence for criminal prosecutions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The search here was not conducted by school authorities on their own initiative or even by school authorities with or at the direction of a law enforcement agency. Instead, it was conducted completely at the discretion of the police officers. The only police contact with a school official was Officer Mondragon’s question to the coach concerning whether students were permitted to enter through the side door. The coach answered that they were not but gave no directive to the officers to search the students. During the pat-down search itself, there were no school authorities present. We thus determine that T.L.O.’s lowered standard of reasonable suspicion does not apply under the circumstances of this appeal. Probable cause was therefore required to conduct the search of [Tywayne].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The special relationship between teacher and student. . . distinguishes the setting within which schoolchildren operate. Law enforcement officers function as adversaries of criminal suspects. These officers have the responsibility to investigate criminal activity, to locate and arrest those who violate our laws, and to facilitate the charging and bringing of such persons to trial. Rarely does this type of adversarial relationship exist between school authorities and pupils. Instead, there is a commonality of interests between teachers and their pupils.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.