State v. Arredondo’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2012 · most notably Arizona v. Gant (2009), State v. Garcia (2005)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · New York v. Belton · Michigan v. Long · United States v. Sharpe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] search incident to a lawful arrest may fall under an exception to the warrant requirement ... if the State meets its burden of proving that the search occurs as a contemporaneous incident to the lawful arrest of the defendant and is confined to the area within the defendant's immediate control.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ponce · State v. Rowell“We believe that a limited vehicle search for weapons when an officer reasonably believes he may be in danger comports with Article II, Section 10 of the New Mexico Constitution provided that it is based upon a particularized showing of exigent circumstances, rather than purely on the theoretical basis that harm could occur.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rowell“`an emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect or destruction of evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Snyder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.