State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2022
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem · United States v. McConney · State v. Attaway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[m]any of the judgments made by counsel in picking a jury are purely intuitive and based upon inarticulable factors. Therefore, while subjective considerations might not be susceptible to objective rebuttal or verification, ... they are permitted because of the inherent nature of peremptory challenges, with the understanding that ultimate Batson findings largely will turn on evaluation of credibility of counsel's explanations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dorado“subjective judgments ... are particularly susceptible to the kind of abuse prohibited by Batson [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dorado“failure to make eye contact and lack of assertiveness”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dorado
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.