Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Ohio App. 3d 26 - Witkowski v. Arditi

123 Ohio App. 3d 26 - Witkowski v. Arditi’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Montgomery v. R & D Chemical Co. · 96 Ohio App. 3d 475 - Crossings Development Ltd. Partnership v. H.O.T., Inc. · 3 Ohio App. 3d 288 - Voyager Village Limited v. Williams · 68 Ohio App. 3d 615 - Skillman v. Browne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A matter is moot where a judgment is sought upon a matter which, when judgment is rendered, will not have any practical effect upon the issues raised by the pleadings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. In re R.T. · Orum Stair, L.L.C. v. GJJG Ents., L.L.C.
  2. “The court of appeals is a court of review that bases its decisions upon a review of the record below.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Helms

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.