Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Ohio App. 3d 322 - State v. Satterwhite

123 Ohio App. 3d 322 - State v. Satterwhite’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably 140 Ohio App. 3d 517 - State v. Petitjean (2000), State v. McLemore (2012)

35 state decisions

2301997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 93 Ohio App. 3d 586 - State v. Retherford · State v. Slatter · 117 Ohio App. 3d 67 - State v. Digiorgio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[W]here a person stopped for a minor misdemeanor furnished the police officer with his name and social security number, and that information is verified by computer, the person has offered satisfactory evidence of his identity. Although we have not required the police to go to extraordinary lengths to verify identification information, police officers cannot avail themselves of the exception to the citation only provision of R.C. 2935.26 by refusing to attempt to verify identification information if the means for doing so are readily available." (Citing State v. Terry (Feb. 28, 1997), Montgomery App. No. 15796.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he offender cannot or will not offer satisfactory evidence of his identity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.