Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Ohio App. 3d 456 - Vickers v. Howe

123 Ohio App. 3d 456 - Vickers v. Howe’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · 63 Ohio St. 3d 590 - State v. S.R. · United Telephone Co. v. Limbach · State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. City of Cincinnati · State ex rel. Toledo Edison Co. v. City of Clyde

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) An unpaid claim, including one for unearned premiums, submitted by a claimant, which arises out of and is within the coverage and is subject to the applicable limits of an insurance policy to which this article applies issued by an insurer if such insurer becomes an insolvent insurer after the effective date of this article....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “{¶ 32} “(1) * * * An unpaid claim, * * * which arises out of and is within the coverage of an insurance policy to which sections 3955.01 to 3955.19 of the Revised Code apply, when issued by an insurer which becomes an insolvent insurer on or after September 4,1970, and * * * the following applies: {¶ 33} “(a) The claimant or insured is a resident of this state at the time of the insured event, provided that for the purpose of determining the place of residence of a claimant or insured that is an entity other than a natural person, the state in which its principal place of business is located at the time of the insured event shall be considered the residence of such claimant or insured.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Ohio Insurance Guaranty Association Act, R.C. Chapter 3955, was designed to protect insureds and third-party claimants from a potentially catastrophic loss due to the insolvency of a member insurer. To this end, OIGA assumes the place of the insolvent insurance carrier for-liability purposes only and provides insurance coverage when no other insurance is available to compensate valid claims.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.