Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Or. 33 - Bramwell v. Rowland

Bramwell v. Rowland’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 1997 · most notably Coquille Mill & Tug Co. v. Robert Dollar Co. (1929), La Luz Community Ditch Co. v. Town of Alamogordo (1929)

39 state decisions

15019271930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co. · Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co. · State v. Pomeroy · Holton v. Holton · Gray v. Brunold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to constitute this kind of estoppel there must exist a false representation or concealment of material facts; it must have been made with knowledge, actual or constructive, of the facts; the party to whom it was made must have been without knowledge or the means of knowledge of the real facts; it must have been made with the intention that it should be acted upon; and the party to whom it was made must have relied on or acted upon it to his prejudice. To constitute an ‘estoppel in pais’ there must concur an admission, statement, or act inconsistent with the claim afterward asserted, action by the other party thereon and injury to such other party. There can be no estoppel if either of these elements are wanting. They are each of equal importance”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.