Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 P3D 126 - State v. Atkins

State v. Atkins’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 99 Wash. 2d 413 - State v. Vladovic · 153 Wash. 2d 765 - State v. Freeman · 92 Wash. 2d 671 - State v. Johnson · 138 Wash. 2d 466 - State v. Sweet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t] o restrict a person’s movements without consent and without legal authority in a manner which interferes substantially with his liberty. Restraint is without consent if it is accomplished by (a) physical force, intimidation, or deception, or (b) any means including acquiescence of the victim, if he is a child less than sixteen years old or an incompetent person and if the parent, guardian, or other person or institution having lawful control or custody of him has not acquiesced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.