Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 P3D 827 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably State v. Abrams (2008), In Re Brooks (2009)

50 state decisions

260200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn · Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C. · 127 Wash. 2d 67 - Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc. · 91 Wash. 2d 342 - State v. Boyer · 42 Wash. 2d 799 - State v. Emmanuel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]ssues relating to the validity of a court order (such as ... whether the order complied with the underlying statutes) are uniquely within the province of the court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A violation of a court order issued under this chapter, chapter 7.90, 9.94A, 10.99, 26.09, 26.10, 26.26, or 74.34 RCW, or of a valid foreign protection order as defined in RCW 26.52.020, is a class C felony if the offender has at least two previous convictions for violating the provisions of an order issued under this chapter, chapter 7.90, 9.94A, 10.99, 26.09, 26.10, 26.26, or 74.34 RCW, or a valid foreign protection order as defined in RCW 26.52.020. The previous convictions may involve the same victim or other victims specifically protected by the orders the offender violated.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is a question of law appropriately within the province of the trial court to decide as part of the court's gate-keeping function.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.