State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 171 - City of Spokane v. Douglass · 122 Wash. 2d 109 - State v. Halstien · 117 Wash. 2d 720 - Haley v. Medical Disciplinary Board · United States v. Loy · 135 Wash. 2d 326 - State v. Riles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`purchas[ing], own[ing], possessing] or perus[ing] any pornography, catalogs or material which can be read or viewed for sexual gratification'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bahl“does not involve First Amendment rights, it must be evaluated as applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zimmer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.