Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 123 Pa. Commw. 8 - Eckert v. Pierotti

123 Pa. Commw. 8 - Eckert v. Pierotti’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2012

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (Alternative Water Sources Act of 2000)

Relies on 110 Pa. Commw. 111 - Stewart v. Zoning Hearing Board · Township of Connoquenessing v. Township of Butler · In re Appeal of Klock · Carroll Township v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is well settled that a municipal corporation may ratify contracts which are within its corporate powers and made by its officers without authority, or in excess of their authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he ratification of a contract by the municipal corporation may be made by the affirmative action of the proper officials, or by any action or nonaction which in the circumstances amounts to an approval of the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t is well settled that contracts which are within the scope of the corporate powers but not authorized by proper action of the municipal corporation... may be ratified by the proper corporate authorities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.